Collins v. State

103 So. 923, 20 Ala. App. 676
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 17, 1925
Docket8 Div. 304.
StatusPublished

This text of 103 So. 923 (Collins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Collins v. State, 103 So. 923, 20 Ala. App. 676 (Ala. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

The offense charged by complaint against this appellant was a violation of the prohibition laws of the state. The complaint originally contained three counts, but upon motion of the solicitor a nol. pros, was ordered as to the third count. The jury returned a general verdict of guilty and assessed a fine, to which the court added three months’ hard labor for the county. Judgment was entered accordingly, from which this appeal was taken. There is no bill of exceptions. The record proper, upon which the appeal is predicated, has been examined, and is without error. The proceedings appear regular in all respects; therefore the judgment of conviction appealed from is affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 So. 923, 20 Ala. App. 676, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/collins-v-state-alactapp-1925.