Collins v. Star Co.

117 N.Y.S. 1131
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Collins v. Star Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 112 N.Y.S. 1055
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided June 25, 1909·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiffs sue to recover the value of a horse hired to the defendant. The facts in this case were discussed in the opinion of this court handed down upon a former appeal. Collins v. Star Co., 112 N. Y. Supp. 1055. In that opinion the court, after reviewing the evidence, said: “This evidence was sufficient to overcome the presumption of liability raised by the defendant’s failure to return the horse, and, in the absence of any proof tending to show that the accident was due to negligence or lack of ordinary care and prudence, on the part of the defendant, the complaint should have been dismissed.” Upon the last trial proof was offered of negligence on the part of the defendant, which was sufficient to sustain the judgment rendered. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Collins v. Star Co., 117 N.Y.S. 1131 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1909).

117 N.Y.S. 1131 (Collins v. Star Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Collins v. Star Co.
112 N.Y.S. 1055 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1908)