Collins v. Rice
This text of Collins v. Rice (Collins v. Rice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
STEVEN MARTELL COLLINS, No. 01-56958 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. CV-98-09329-TJH BERTRAM RICE; ATTORNEY Central District GENERAL OF THE STATE OF of California, CALIFORNIA, Los Angeles Respondents-Appellees. ORDER
On Remand from the United States Supreme Court
Filed July 7, 2006
Before: Cynthia Holcomb Hall, Sidney R. Thomas, and Richard A. Paez, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
Pursuant to the opinion of the Supreme Court in Rice v. Collins, ___ U.S. ___, 126 S.Ct. 969 (2006), the judgment of the district court is affirmed. The mandate shall issue forth- with.
7549 PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO
The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2006 Thomson/West.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Collins v. Rice, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/collins-v-rice-ca9-2006.