Collins v. Padula

582 F. App'x 258
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 3, 2014·No. No. 14-6533·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Robbie Collins appeals the ' district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge in part and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Collins v. Padula, No. 2:12-cv-03112-DCN-BHH, 2014 WL 1318978 (D.S.C. Mar. 31, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Collins v. Padula, 582 F. App'x 258 (4th Cir. 2014).

582 F. App'x 258 (Collins v. Padula) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Babb v. Hayes
W.D. Virginia, 2023