Collins v. Nicholson
This text of Collins v. Nicholson (Collins v. Nicholson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Note: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2006-7378
JOHNNIE COLLINS,
Claimant-Appellant,
v.
R. JAMES NICHOLSON, Secretary of Veterans Affairs,
Respondent-Appellee.
James L. Harris, of Nashville, Tennessee, for claimant-appellant.
Martin F. Hockey, Jr., Senior Trial Counsel, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, for respondent- appellee. With him on the brief was Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General. Of counsel on the brief were Michael J. Timinski, Assistant General Counsel.
Appealed from: United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Chief Judge William P. Greene, Jr. Note: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2006-7378
JOHNNIE M. COLLINS,
Claimant-Appellant, v.
__________________________
DECIDED: June 11, 2007 __________________________
Before MICHEL, Chief Judge, DYK, Circuit Judge, and OTERO, District Judge. ∗
MICHEL, Chief Judge.
Petitioner Johnnie M. Collins appeals from an en banc decision of the U.S. Court
of Appeals for Veterans Claims (“Veterans Court”) dismissing Mr. Collins’s appeal on
the ground that his Notice of Appeal was not timely filed under 38 U.S.C. § 7266(c).
Rios v. Nicholson, 20 Vet. App. 104 (2006) (en banc). Because the Veterans Court
erred by precluding Mr. Collins from relying upon the common law mailbox rule to show
timely filing, we reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with our decision
in Rios v. Nicholson, No. 2006-7352 (Fed. Cir. June 11, 2007).
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
∗ Honorable S. James Otero, District Judge, United States District Court for the Central District of California, sitting by designation.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Collins v. Nicholson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/collins-v-nicholson-cafc-2007.