Collins v. Nicholson

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedJune 11, 2007
Docket2006-7378
StatusUnpublished

This text of Collins v. Nicholson (Collins v. Nicholson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Collins v. Nicholson, (Fed. Cir. 2007).

Opinion

Note: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2006-7378

JOHNNIE COLLINS,

Claimant-Appellant,

v.

R. JAMES NICHOLSON, Secretary of Veterans Affairs,

Respondent-Appellee.

James L. Harris, of Nashville, Tennessee, for claimant-appellant.

Martin F. Hockey, Jr., Senior Trial Counsel, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, for respondent- appellee. With him on the brief was Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General. Of counsel on the brief were Michael J. Timinski, Assistant General Counsel.

Appealed from: United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Chief Judge William P. Greene, Jr. Note: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2006-7378

JOHNNIE M. COLLINS,

Claimant-Appellant, v.

__________________________

DECIDED: June 11, 2007 __________________________

Before MICHEL, Chief Judge, DYK, Circuit Judge, and OTERO, District Judge. ∗

MICHEL, Chief Judge.

Petitioner Johnnie M. Collins appeals from an en banc decision of the U.S. Court

of Appeals for Veterans Claims (“Veterans Court”) dismissing Mr. Collins’s appeal on

the ground that his Notice of Appeal was not timely filed under 38 U.S.C. § 7266(c).

Rios v. Nicholson, 20 Vet. App. 104 (2006) (en banc). Because the Veterans Court

erred by precluding Mr. Collins from relying upon the common law mailbox rule to show

timely filing, we reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with our decision

in Rios v. Nicholson, No. 2006-7352 (Fed. Cir. June 11, 2007).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

∗ Honorable S. James Otero, District Judge, United States District Court for the Central District of California, sitting by designation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rios-Collins v. Nicholson
20 Vet. App. 104 (Veterans Claims, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Collins v. Nicholson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/collins-v-nicholson-cafc-2007.