Collins v. Nester

497 S.W.3d 355, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 839, 2016 WL 4525309
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 30, 2016·No. No. ED 103766·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Derek Collins (“Intervenor”) appeals from the probate court’s denial of his motion to intervene in the probate proceedings of Harvey Foster’s estate. The motion requested intervention to protect Interve-nor’s financial interest under a newly dis[356] covered will (the “Will”)) which had not previously been admitted to probate, and which was presented to the Court more than one year after decedent’s death. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Collins v. Nester, 497 S.W.3d 355, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 839, 2016 WL 4525309 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

497 S.W.3d 355 (Collins v. Nester) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.