Collins v. Missouri Recycling Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Collins v. Missouri Recycling Co.

833 S.W.2d 893, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1359, 1992 WL 195493

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 18, 1992·No. No. 61589·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals from an award to claimant by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals from an award to claimant by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Collins v. Missouri Recycling Co., 833 S.W.2d 893, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1359, 1992 WL 195493 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

833 S.W.2d 893 (Collins v. Missouri Recycling Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.