Collins v. Miller

52 Ohio St. (N.S.) 677
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 23, 1895·No. No. 2704·Published

Opinion

Upon the uncontradicted testimony in the case, and particularly that of plaintiff below, Hartmen Miller, he is not, upon the authority of Trimble v. Doty, 16 Ohio St., 118, and of Pride v. Andrew, 51. Ohio St., 405, entitled to any relief.

The cause is therefore reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Collins v. Miller, 52 Ohio St. (N.S.) 677 (Ohio 1895).

52 Ohio St. (N.S.) 677 (Collins v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kemp v. Walker
16 Ohio St. 118 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1847)