Collins v. Marvil

Indiana Supreme Court

Collins v. Marvil

44 N.E. 487, 145 Ind. 531, 1896 Ind. LEXIS 92

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedJune 19, 1896

DocketNo. 17,827

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 44 N.E. 487 (Collins v. Marvil) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Collins v. Marvil, 44 N.E. 487, 145 Ind. 531, 1896 Ind. LEXIS 92 (Ind. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

Jordan, J.

— The questions presented by this case have been decided adversely to the contentions of appellant, in the opinion of this court in the appeal of State v. Qerhardt, ante, 439, with one exception, which is the contention herein of appellant that the law does not permit a remonstrator, under section nine of the Act of 1895, (Acts of 1895, p. 248), to use only the initials of his Christian name in signing a remonstrance against granting a license to' an applicant to sell intoxicating liquors. This claim as made by appellant cannot be sustained.

In the case of State, ex rel., v. Beck, 81 Ind. 500, it was held that articles of association for a turnpike company may be subscribed by the corporators by their usual signatures, and that the use of initials to designate their "Christian names is not obectionable'. See Wassels v. State, 20 Ind. 30; Vanderkarr v. State, 51 Ind. 91.

It is always better, perhaps, for a person, in subscribing his name to any document, to write the first part of his Christian name in full, as well as his surname. We think, however, that a remonstrator, under section nine, supra, muy be permitted to employ initials to indicate his Christian name, in subscribing a remonstrance, provided he write his surname in full.

There is no error shown in this appeal, and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jordan, J.

— The questions presented by this case have been decided adversely to the contentions of appellant, in the opinion of this court in the appeal of State v. Qerhardt, ante, 439, with one exception, which is the contention herein of appellant that the law does not permit a remonstrator, under section nine of the Act of 1895, (Acts of 1895, p. 248), to use only the initials of his Christian name in signing a remonstrance against granting a license to' an applicant to sell intoxicating liquors. This claim as made by appellant cannot be sustained.

In the case of State, ex rel., v. Beck, 81 Ind. 500, it was held that articles of association for a turnpike company may be subscribed by the corporators by their usual signatures, and that the use of initials to designate their "Christian names is not obectionable'. See Wassels v. State, 20 Ind. 30; Vanderkarr v. State, 51 Ind. 91.

It is always better, perhaps, for a person, in subscribing his name to any document, to write the first part of his Christian name in full, as well as his surname. We think, however, that a remonstrator, under section nine, supra, muy be permitted to employ initials to indicate his Christian name, in subscribing a remonstrance, provided he write his surname in full.

There is no error shown in this appeal, and the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

44 N.E. 487, 145 Ind. 531, 1896 Ind. LEXIS 92, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/collins-v-marvil-ind-1896.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack