Collins v. Lynch

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Collins v. Lynch

31 A. 921, 167 Pa. 635, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 962

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Collins v. Lynch. Read the opinion of the Court — 157 Pa. 246 →

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 29, 1895·No. Appeal, No. 112·Published

Opinion

Pee Cuetam,

This case depended mainly on questions of fact which were fairly submitted to the jury, and by them determined in favor of the plaintiff. An examination of the record discloses no substantial error in any of the learned court’s rulings, or in its instructions to the jury. The case appears to have been tried in [644]*644substantial accordance with the views of this court as expressed in opinion on former appeal.

We find nothing in the record that would justify us in sustaining any of the assignments of error.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cuetam,

This case depended mainly on questions of fact which were fairly submitted to the jury, and by them determined in favor of the plaintiff. An examination of the record discloses no substantial error in any of the learned court’s rulings, or in its instructions to the jury. The case appears to have been tried in [644]*644substantial accordance with the views of this court as expressed in opinion on former appeal.

We find nothing in the record that would justify us in sustaining any of the assignments of error.

Judgment affirmed.

Collins v. Lynch, 31 A. 921, 167 Pa. 635, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 962 (Pa. 1895).

Pincite

31 A. 921 (Collins v. Lynch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.