Collins v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad

70 Ala. 533
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedDecember 15, 1881
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 70 Ala. 533 (Collins v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Collins v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad, 70 Ala. 533 (Ala. 1881).

Opinion

BB.ICKELL, C. J.

This appeal is prosecuted from the award of arbitrators, to whom the parties to a pending suit submitted the matters in controversy for decision. The record does not show that the award has been entered as the judgment of the court in which.the suit was, and, so far as we are now informed, is yet pending. In the absence of a statute authorizing it, an appeal, writ of error, or other revisory remedy, will not lie to any court from the award of arbitrators. The award may be impeached and vacated, whenever the party in whose favor it is rendered relies upon, or seeks its enforcement, if fraud, partiality, or corruption can be imputed to the arbitrators ; or if they transcend the submission; or if it is wanting in the elements of finality and conclusiveness, not determining the matters embraced in the submission. These are inquiries which can become the subject of contestation in the courts, only when the award is pleaded as the cause of action, or as matter of defense.

The statute (Code of 1876, § 3517) authorizes the courts of primary jurisdiction to enter, under certain circumstances, the award of arbitrators, as the judgment or decree of the court, and implies and involves the power of the court to set aside the award; and, employing the language of the statute, “ from the judgment or decree so entered up, or from the judgment set[534]*534ting aside the award, an appeal shall lie, as in other cases.” It is from the decree or judgment of the court, entering the award as its judgment, or setting the award aside, an appeal is given, and not from the award itself. Until the award is entered as the judgment of the Circuit Court, it does not dispose of the cause therein pending — it is not of injury to the appellant. The statute gives an appeal from that, judgment, and not from the, award. Until the judgment is entered, the award is merely matter which may or not become of injury to the "party against whom it is rendered.

The court is without jurisdiction of this appeal, and it must be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Honea v. Raymond James Fin. Servs., Inc.
240 So. 3d 550 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2017)
Raymond James Financial Services, Inc. v. Honea
141 So. 3d 1012 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2013)
Parham v. American Bankers Insurance Co. of Florida
24 So. 3d 1102 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2009)
Championcomm.net of Tuscaloosa, Inc. v. Morton
12 So. 3d 1197 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2009)
Moss v. Upchurch
179 So. 2d 741 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1965)
Draper v. Walker
98 Ala. 310 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1893)
Dudley v. Farris
79 Ala. 187 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1885)
Bell v. Sampey
80 Ala. 372 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1885)
Chapman v. Ewing
78 Ala. 403 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1884)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
70 Ala. 533, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/collins-v-louisville-nashville-railroad-ala-1881.