Collins v. Lloyds Underwriters at London

657 So. 2d 473, 95 La.App. 3 Cir. 104, 1995 La. App. LEXIS 1419, 1995 WL 323157
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedMay 31, 1995
DocketNo. 95-104
StatusPublished

This text of 657 So. 2d 473 (Collins v. Lloyds Underwriters at London) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Collins v. Lloyds Underwriters at London, 657 So. 2d 473, 95 La.App. 3 Cir. 104, 1995 La. App. LEXIS 1419, 1995 WL 323157 (La. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

DOUCET, Chief Judge.

For the reasons given in the companion case hereto, Smith v. Arcadian Corporation, et al., 95-97 (La.App. 3 Cir. 5/31/95), 657 So.2d 464, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed, at the cost of the appellant, Arcadian Corp.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. Arcadian Corp.
657 So. 2d 464 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
657 So. 2d 473, 95 La.App. 3 Cir. 104, 1995 La. App. LEXIS 1419, 1995 WL 323157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/collins-v-lloyds-underwriters-at-london-lactapp-1995.