Collins v. Humphreys

S.D. Indiana

Collins v. Humphreys

231 F. Supp. 2d 851, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25634, 2002 WL 31553778

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana

DecidedOctober 22, 2002

DocketIP 01-244-C-Y/K

StatusPublished

This text of 231 F. Supp. 2d 851 (Collins v. Humphreys) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Indiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Collins v. Humphreys, 231 F. Supp. 2d 851, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25634, 2002 WL 31553778 (S.D. Ind. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ RULE 60 MOTION TO CORRECT CLERICAL MISTAKE

RICHARD L. YOUNG, Judge.

Pursuant to Rule 60(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiffs move the court to correct a clerical mistake con *852 tained in the court’s October 1, 2002 Entry on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment (the “October 1, 2002 Entry”). In its October 1, 2002 Entry, the court granted Plaintiffs’ request for a “preliminary” rather than a “permanent” injunction. This was in error. Accordingly, the court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ Rule 60 Motion to Correct Clerical Mistake.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Plaintiffs’ Rule 60 Motion to Correct Clerical Mistake is GRANTED. The court hereby strikes the word “preliminary” contained in the last paragraph of Section V(B)(2) and in the Conclusion of the October 1, 2002 Entry and inserts the word “permanent.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ RULE 60 MOTION TO CORRECT CLERICAL MISTAKE

RICHARD L. YOUNG, Judge.

Pursuant to Rule 60(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiffs move the court to correct a clerical mistake con *852 tained in the court’s October 1, 2002 Entry on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment (the “October 1, 2002 Entry”). In its October 1, 2002 Entry, the court granted Plaintiffs’ request for a “preliminary” rather than a “permanent” injunction. This was in error. Accordingly, the court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ Rule 60 Motion to Correct Clerical Mistake.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Plaintiffs’ Rule 60 Motion to Correct Clerical Mistake is GRANTED. The court hereby strikes the word “preliminary” contained in the last paragraph of Section V(B)(2) and in the Conclusion of the October 1, 2002 Entry and inserts the word “permanent.”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

231 F. Supp. 2d 851, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25634, 2002 WL 31553778, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/collins-v-humphreys-insd-2002.