Collins v. Hill

41 S.E. 678, 115 Ga. 465, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 453
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedApril 30, 1902
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 41 S.E. 678 (Collins v. Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Collins v. Hill, 41 S.E. 678, 115 Ga. 465, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 453 (Ga. 1902).

Opinion

Cobb, J.

1. There can be no legal verdict in favor of the plaintiff in execution in a claim case unless there is introduced in evidence at the trial a valid, unsatisfied execution in favor of the plaintiff in execution against the defendant in execution. If the execution introduced in evidence is for any reason void, or if no execution is offered in evidence, the plaintiff in execution fails to make out his case, and the levy should be dismissed. Gunn v. McMichael, 68 Ga. 826 (2); Funkhouser v. Male, 110 Ga. 766(3), and cases cited.

2. When in the trial of a claim case the plaintiff in execution offers to introduce the execution in evidence, and upon objection to its introduction being made withdraws the same, and the evidence is closed without the execution being again offered, it is error to direct a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in execution ; the only proper judgment to be entered would be to dismiss the levy.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concurring, except Lewis, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Autry, House & Co. v. Smith
125 S.E. 384 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
41 S.E. 678, 115 Ga. 465, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 453, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/collins-v-hill-ga-1902.