Collins v. Freeman

333 So. 2d 513, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15166
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 18, 1976·No. No. 75-1509·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant-plaintiff, Maude Collins, appeals a final order of the trial court dismissing plaintiff’s case for want of prosecution.

Upon review of the record on appeal and after consideration of the briefs submitted by counsel for the respective parties, we conclude that actions taken by the plaintiff herein constituted sufficient diligence in the prosecution of her case as to preclude dismissal thereof by the trial court. Popkin v. Crispen, 213 So.2d 445 (Fla.App. 1968). The trial court, therefore, abused its discretion in dismissing plaintiff’s case for want of prosecution.

Accordingly, the final order of dismissal is reversed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the views herein expressed.

WALDEN, . C. J., and CROSS and MAGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Collins v. Freeman, 333 So. 2d 513, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15166 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

333 So. 2d 513 (Collins v. Freeman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Popkin v. Crispen
213 So. 2d 445 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)