Collins v. Freeman

333 So. 2d 513, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15166
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 18, 1976
DocketNo. 75-1509
StatusPublished

This text of 333 So. 2d 513 (Collins v. Freeman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Collins v. Freeman, 333 So. 2d 513, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15166 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant-plaintiff, Maude Collins, appeals a final order of the trial court dismissing plaintiff’s case for want of prosecution.

Upon review of the record on appeal and after consideration of the briefs submitted by counsel for the respective parties, we conclude that actions taken by the plaintiff herein constituted sufficient diligence in the prosecution of her case as to preclude dismissal thereof by the trial court. Popkin v. Crispen, 213 So.2d 445 (Fla.App. 1968). The trial court, therefore, abused its discretion in dismissing plaintiff’s case for want of prosecution.

Accordingly, the final order of dismissal is reversed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the views herein expressed.

WALDEN, . C. J., and CROSS and MAGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Popkin v. Crispen
213 So. 2d 445 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
333 So. 2d 513, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15166, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/collins-v-freeman-fladistctapp-1976.