Collins v. Fox

D. Montana

Collins v. Fox

DecidedJanuary 24, 2020

Docket6:19-cv-00082

StatusUnknown

This text of Collins v. Fox (Collins v. Fox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Montana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Collins v. Fox, (D. Mont. 2020).

Pincite

Opinion

BS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Fi LE □ FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA JAN 24 2029 HELENA DIVISION Clerk, U.S Distri District OF □□□□□ Missoula MARK WILLIAM COLLINS, CV 19-82-H-DLC-JTJ Plaintiff, VS. ORDER TIM FOX, JOHN MICU, SCOTT HOWARD, MARK HILYARD, MORGAN SMITH, and CHRIS MILLER, Defendants.

United States Magistrate Judge John T. Johnston entered a Findings and Recommendations on December 30, 2019, recommending that the Court stay proceedings in this matter pending the completion of Plaintiff Mark William Collins’s appeal of his state criminal conviction. (Doc. 11; see also Doc. 9.) Collins did not object to the Findings and Recommendations; in fact, he agrees that

a stay is appropriate (Doc. 10). Thus, Collins has waived the right to de novo review of the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). This Court reviews for clear error those findings and recommendations to which no party objects. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-53 (1985). Clear error exists if the Court is left with a “definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.” Wash. Mut., Inc. v.

-]-

United States, 856 F.3d 711, 721 (9th Cir. 2017) (citation omitted). Having reviewed the Findings and Recommendations (Doc. 11), the Court finds no clear error in Judge Johnston’s recommendation that this matter be stayed pursuant to Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: (1) Plaintiff Mark William Collins’s Motion to Stay (Doc. 10) is GRANTED; (2) Judge Johnston’s Findings and Recommendations (Doc. 11) is ADOPTED IN FULL; (3) The Clerk of Court shall administratively close this matter; (4) Collins shall file a report on the status of his state criminal proceeding every six months until such time as his criminal charges have been resolved; and (5) In the event that Collins would like to continue this matter after resolution of the state proceeding, he must request that the stay be lifted and the

case reopened within 30 days of resolution of his state criminal appeal. DATED this 24Miay of January, 2920. iL. Cldtnan Dana L. Christensen, Chief Judge United States District Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Fi LE □ FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA JAN 24 2029 HELENA DIVISION Clerk, U.S Distri District OF □□□□□ Missoula MARK WILLIAM COLLINS, CV 19-82-H-DLC-JTJ Plaintiff, VS. ORDER TIM FOX, JOHN MICU, SCOTT HOWARD, MARK HILYARD, MORGAN SMITH, and CHRIS MILLER, Defendants.

United States Magistrate Judge John T. Johnston entered a Findings and Recommendations on December 30, 2019, recommending that the Court stay proceedings in this matter pending the completion of Plaintiff Mark William Collins’s appeal of his state criminal conviction. (Doc. 11; see also Doc. 9.) Collins did not object to the Findings and Recommendations; in fact, he agrees that

a stay is appropriate (Doc. 10). Thus, Collins has waived the right to de novo review of the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). This Court reviews for clear error those findings and recommendations to which no party objects. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-53 (1985). Clear error exists if the Court is left with a “definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.” Wash. Mut., Inc. v.

-]-

United States, 856 F.3d 711, 721 (9th Cir. 2017) (citation omitted). Having reviewed the Findings and Recommendations (Doc. 11), the Court finds no clear error in Judge Johnston’s recommendation that this matter be stayed pursuant to Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: (1) Plaintiff Mark William Collins’s Motion to Stay (Doc. 10) is GRANTED; (2) Judge Johnston’s Findings and Recommendations (Doc. 11) is ADOPTED IN FULL; (3) The Clerk of Court shall administratively close this matter; (4) Collins shall file a report on the status of his state criminal proceeding every six months until such time as his criminal charges have been resolved; and (5) In the event that Collins would like to continue this matter after resolution of the state proceeding, he must request that the stay be lifted and the

case reopened within 30 days of resolution of his state criminal appeal. DATED this 24Miay of January, 2920. iL. Cldtnan Dana L. Christensen, Chief Judge United States District Court

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Collins v. Fox, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/collins-v-fox-mtd-2020.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack