Collins v. Fischer

113 A.D.3d 973, 979 N.Y.2d 193

This text of 113 A.D.3d 973 (Collins v. Fischer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Collins v. Fischer, 113 A.D.3d 973, 979 N.Y.2d 193 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

[974]*974We confirm. The misbehavior report, together with the testimony of the recipient of the note and the captain to whom she reported the incident, provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt (see Matter of Monroe v Fischer, 87 AD3d 1300, 1301 [2011]; Matter of Morusma v Fischer, 74 AD3d 1675, 1675 [2010]). The contrary testimony of petitioner and his inmate witness presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Connelly v Griffin, 101 AD3d 1211, 1212 [2012]; Matter of Truman v Fischer, 75 AD3d 1019, 1020 [2010]). Petitioner’s claim that he was improperly denied documentary evidence, specifically the note, and that this violated his due process right to put forth a defense is unpersuasive. The captain to whom the note was given explained that it had apparently been lost sometime after he placed it in the correction officer’s mailbox with instructions to prepare a misbehavior report. After he became aware that the note had been lost, the captain prepared a memorandum confirming its contents. Inasmuch as there is nothing in the record to indicate that the failure to produce the note was done in bad faith, there was no due process violation (see Matter of Russell v Selsky, 50 AD3d 1412, 1413 [2008]; Matter of Morgan v Goord, 10 AD3d 792, 793 [2004]). We have reviewed petitioner’s remaining contentions and also find them to be lacking in merit.

Peters, P.J., Lahtinen, McCarthy and Garry, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Morgan v. Goord
10 A.D.3d 792 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Russell v. Selsky
50 A.D.3d 1412 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Morusma v. Fischer
74 A.D.3d 1675 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Truman v. Fischer
75 A.D.3d 1019 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Monroe v. Fischer
87 A.D.3d 1300 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Connelly v. Griffin
101 A.D.3d 1211 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
113 A.D.3d 973, 979 N.Y.2d 193, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/collins-v-fischer-nyappdiv-2014.