Collins v. . Faribault

92 N.C. 310
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedFebruary 5, 1885
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 92 N.C. 310 (Collins v. . Faribault) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Collins v. . Faribault, 92 N.C. 310 (N.C. 1885).

Opinion

Mérrimos, J.

The appellees move to dismiss the appeal in this case upon the ground that it was not brought to the term of this Court that came next after it was taken.

It appears that the appeal was taken at the Spring Term, 1884, of the Superior Court of Chowan county; that it was not brought up to the last October Term of this Court, nor until the 25th day of January of the present year, when it was docketed here.

*311 It is settled that an appeal must be brought to the term of this Court that comes next after it was taken, or if for any cause it does not then come up, some appropriate steps must be taken during that term to bring it up, otherwise the appeal will be lost entirely, unless, for good cause shown, it shall afterwards be brought up by the writ of certiorari.

It appears from a memorandum in the record that time was granted by the Court until the first day of the last October Term of this Court, within which to perfect the appeal, and this leave was granted by consent of parties. It is insisted that therefore the appeal stood over and properly came to the present term of this Court. If, by consent, such an arrangement could be made .(and this is not conceded), it is .very plain that it was contemplated by the Court in granting the leave, that the appeal was to be perfected and brought up to the last October Term, when in the order of procedure, it ought to have been brought up.

The appellee had a right to have the appeal heard and determined at the last term, unless for good cause it had been continued. As it was not then brought up,.he now has the right to have the appeal dismissed. Neither the terms nor the spirit of the leave given to perfect the appeal within the time specified, were complied with, nor were the requirements of the law observed.

Indeed, the undertaking upon appeal was not given until the 25th of January of the present year. The motion to dismiss the appeal must, therefore, be allowed.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Norwood v. . Pratt
32 S.E. 979 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1899)
Burrell v. . Hughes
26 S.E. 782 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1897)
Board of Commissioners v. Old Dominion Steamship Co.
3 S.E. 505 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1887)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
92 N.C. 310, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/collins-v-faribault-nc-1885.