Collins v. Escambia Roof Master

908 So. 2d 1149, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 12762, 2005 WL 1991857
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 19, 2005
DocketNo. 1D04-3536
StatusPublished

This text of 908 So. 2d 1149 (Collins v. Escambia Roof Master) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Collins v. Escambia Roof Master, 908 So. 2d 1149, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 12762, 2005 WL 1991857 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The claimant is not entitled to recover workers’ compensation benefits from the employer/carrier because the claimant filed a valid notice of election to be exempt from the provisions of chapter 440, Florida Statutes. See Battle v. Gentry, 898 So.2d 263 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005); § 440.10(1), Fla. Stat. (2002). Therefore, the JCC’s ruling is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

KAHN, C.J., BARFIELD and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Battle v. Gentry
898 So. 2d 263 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
908 So. 2d 1149, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 12762, 2005 WL 1991857, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/collins-v-escambia-roof-master-fladistctapp-2005.