Collins v. Collins

2 Grant 117
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJuly 1, 1854
StatusPublished

This text of 2 Grant 117 (Collins v. Collins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Collins v. Collins, 2 Grant 117 (Pa. 1854).

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Knox, J.

— This case exhibits an attempt, on the part of a son, to claim more land than his father had devised to Mm, upon the pretence of a parol gift. As usual, in cases of this hind, the evidence of the alleged gift consists of declarations made by the father to strangers, in the absence of his son, many years before the trial; wMlst on the other hand, a state of facts is- shown, utterly irreconcilable with the allegation of the plaintiff in error. The court below left the facts to the jury, with a strong intimation, that the bar of the Statute of Frauds and Perjuries was not avoided; and so the jury found.

Under the authority of Moore v. Small, 7 Harris, 461; Rankin v. Simpson, Ib. 471, the learned judge of the Common Pleas should have given positive instructions to the jury, that the alleged parol gift was not established. But as these cases were not reported when this cause was tried, they furnished no guide, and the jury was suffered to pass upon the facts.

There was no error committed of wMch the plaintiff in error can complain.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Grant 117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/collins-v-collins-pa-1854.