Collins v. Collins

98 N.E. 588, 212 Mass. 131, 1912 Mass. LEXIS 885
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedMay 24, 1912
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 98 N.E. 588 (Collins v. Collins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Collins v. Collins, 98 N.E. 588, 212 Mass. 131, 1912 Mass. LEXIS 885 (Mass. 1912).

Opinion

DeCourcy, J.

In her antenuptial contract with John Collins the defendant agreed, in the event of her surviving him, to release all interest in his estate except the claim for $1,000 and the security provided therefor. The bill of complaint alleges that the plaintiff, who is the sole heir of the deceased husband, has duly tendered this money and is ready and willing to pay it to the defendant, but that she refuses to release her interest in the estate. The contract is a lawful one and will be enforced in equity. Paine v. Hollister, 139 Mass. 144.

The provisions of R. L. c. 153, § 26, relied upon in the defendant’s demurrer, apply only to antenuptial contracts enabling the respective parties to hold their separate property after marriage, and do not affect an antenuptial agreement relating only to the rights which a widow may claim in the estate of her deceased husband. So far as the bill discloses, the defendant, had no separate property. Even assuming that the statute may apply to the agreement in question, it does not affect her obligation to release [134]*134all interest in the estate of her late husband; and the demurrer was rightly overruled. Jenkins v. Holt, 109 Mass. 261. Freeland v. Freeland, 128 Mass. 509.

Decree affirmed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bickford v. Bickford
12 Mass. L. Rptr. 378 (Massachusetts Superior Court, 1999)
Price v. Price
170 N.E.2d 346 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1960)
Keith v. Keith
73 N.E.2d 825 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1947)
Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Bristol
121 F.2d 129 (First Circuit, 1941)
Benner v. Lunt
136 A. 814 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1927)
Wellington v. Rugg
243 Mass. 30 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1922)
Eaton v. Eaton
233 Mass. 351 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1919)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
98 N.E. 588, 212 Mass. 131, 1912 Mass. LEXIS 885, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/collins-v-collins-mass-1912.