Collins v. City of Seattle

2 Wash. Terr. 354
CourtWashington Territory
DecidedJuly 15, 1885
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2 Wash. Terr. 354 (Collins v. City of Seattle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Territory primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Collins v. City of Seattle, 2 Wash. Terr. 354 (Wash. Super. Ct. 1885).

Opinion

[355]*355Opinion by

Wingard, Associate Justice.

The appeal to this Court was taken under the Act of 1883.

There is no certificate of the Judge to the statement of facts, that said statement contains all the material facts in the cause, nor the material facts in the cause.

The motion to strike it from the record is therefore sustained.

There is no assignment of errors in this case served upon the adverse party or his attorney, nor can the paper claimed to be such assignment be considered as a paper in the case.

The motion to affirm the judgment is therefore allowed.

For the reasons given in Wilson v. Wald & Campbell, announced this morning (July 17, 1885), we think there has not been a general appearance in the cause.

We concur: John P. Hoyt, Associate Justice.

George Turner, Associate Justice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dill v. Zielke
173 P.2d 977 (Washington Supreme Court, 1946)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Wash. Terr. 354, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/collins-v-city-of-seattle-washterr-1885.