Collins v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Collins v. City of New York

251 A.D.2d 443, 674 N.Y.S.2d 399, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6875

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1998

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 251 A.D.2d 443 (Collins v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Collins v. City of New York, 251 A.D.2d 443, 674 N.Y.S.2d 399, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6875 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Sangiorgio, J.), dated July 9, 1997, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly concluded that the injured plaintiff assumed the risks inherent in playing on the outdoor basketball court where he slipped on some berries and fell. The injured plaintiff, an experienced basketball player who had played on the very same basketball court on many prior occasions, was fully aware of the berries which fell from overhanging tree branches. Since the plaintiff voluntarily assumed the risk that he might slip on the basketball court while participating in the game, summary judgment was properly granted to the defendant (see, Morgan v State of New York, 90 NY2d 471; [444]*444Benitez v New York City Bd. of Educ., 73 NY2d 650; Turcotte v Fell, 68 NY2d 432; Maddox v City of New York, 66 NY2d 270; Reilly v Long Is. Jr. Soccer League, 216 AD2d 281; Gallagher v Town of N. Hempstead, 144 AD2d 637). Mangano, P. J., Miller, Pizzuto and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Sangiorgio, J.), dated July 9, 1997, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly concluded that the injured plaintiff assumed the risks inherent in playing on the outdoor basketball court where he slipped on some berries and fell. The injured plaintiff, an experienced basketball player who had played on the very same basketball court on many prior occasions, was fully aware of the berries which fell from overhanging tree branches. Since the plaintiff voluntarily assumed the risk that he might slip on the basketball court while participating in the game, summary judgment was properly granted to the defendant (see, Morgan v State of New York, 90 NY2d 471; [444]*444Benitez v New York City Bd. of Educ., 73 NY2d 650; Turcotte v Fell, 68 NY2d 432; Maddox v City of New York, 66 NY2d 270; Reilly v Long Is. Jr. Soccer League, 216 AD2d 281; Gallagher v Town of N. Hempstead, 144 AD2d 637). Mangano, P. J., Miller, Pizzuto and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

251 A.D.2d 443, 674 N.Y.S.2d 399, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6875, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/collins-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack