Collins v. Cale

Indiana Court of Appeals

Collins v. Cale

162 N.E. 910, 87 Ind. App. 669, 1928 Ind. App. LEXIS 82

Indiana Court of Appeals·Decided July 19, 1928·No. No. 13,092.·Published

Opinion

Thompson, J.

Appellee brought this action to recover for damages sustained by his automobile, which was in collision with appellant’s automobile on a public highway.

There was a trial by the court, resulting in a judgment *670 in appellee’s favor for $700. A motion for a new trial was overruled and exception saved.

The error assigned is the overruling of the motion for a new trial, which presents the question of the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the decision of the court.

There is evidence in the record to sustain the decision.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thompson, J.

Appellee brought this action to recover for damages sustained by his automobile, which was in collision with appellant’s automobile on a public highway.

There was a trial by the court, resulting in a judgment *670 in appellee’s favor for $700. A motion for a new trial was overruled and exception saved.

The error assigned is the overruling of the motion for a new trial, which presents the question of the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the decision of the court.

There is evidence in the record to sustain the decision.

Judgment affirmed.

Collins v. Cale, 162 N.E. 910, 87 Ind. App. 669, 1928 Ind. App. LEXIS 82 (Ind. Ct. App. 1928).

Pincite

162 N.E. 910 (Collins v. Cale) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.