Collins v. Brooks

20 How. Pr. 327
New York Court of Common Pleas·Decided February 15, 1861·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

By the court, Hilton, J.

I think this verdict should not be disturbed, although I fully agree with Judge Daly in the rule of law stated by him. But in the present case the defendant, by accepting the return of the boots, without objection, must be regarded as consenting to rescinding the contract, and therefore cannot retain the money paid him on account of it. Upon the evidence the plaintiff was entitled to the verdict which the jury gave, and the charge of the judge cannot operate to deprive him of it. In my opinion the judgment should be affirmed.

Brady, J., concurred with Judge Hilton in the view of the case presented by his opinion.

Daly, J., dissented.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Collins v. Brooks, 20 How. Pr. 327 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1861).

20 How. Pr. 327 (Collins v. Brooks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dougherty v. Neville
108 A.D. 89 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905)
Russell v. Wolff
19 Misc. 536 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1897)
Shaen v. Gumpert
4 N.Y.S. 553 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1889)