Collins v. Beatty

23 A. 982, 148 Pa. 65, 1892 Pa. LEXIS 909
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 28, 1892·No. Appeal, No. 394·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

We do not think the court below erred in giving the jury a binding instruction in favor of the defendant. The action was trespass quare clausum fregit, and the plea “ not guilty.” The evidence showed the defendant to have been in possession of the locus in quo at the time the alleged trespass was committed, and for some years before. Under such circumstances the action of trespass cannot be maintained.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Collins v. Beatty, 23 A. 982, 148 Pa. 65, 1892 Pa. LEXIS 909 (Pa. 1892).

23 A. 982 (Collins v. Beatty) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lieberman v. Garbo Amusement Co.
38 Pa. D. & C. 153 (Delaware County Court of Common Pleas, 1939)
Consolidation Coal Co. v. Friedline
3 A.2d 200 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1938)
Humes v. Kramer
133 A. 262 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1926)
Kossell v. Rhoades
116 A. 56 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1922)
Hartley v. Spencer
75 Pa. Super. 449 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1921)
Griffin v. Delaware & Hudson Co.
101 A. 750 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1917)
Weisfield v. Beale
79 A. 878 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1911)
Weisfield v. Beale
44 Pa. Super. 386 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1910)
Morris v. Knight
14 Pa. Super. 324 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1900)
Busch v. Calhoun
14 Pa. Super. 578 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1900)