Collins v. Barding

Supreme Court of Missouri

Collins v. Barding

65 Mo. 496

CourtSupreme Court of Missouri

DecidedOctober 15, 1877

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 65 Mo. 496 (Collins v. Barding) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Collins v. Barding, 65 Mo. 496 (Mo. 1877).

Pincite

Opinion

Sherwood, C. J.

Action on promissory notes, the questions in the case all concerning the pleas of payment and of the statute of limitations. It is impossible lor us to notice the alleged errors, as the motion for a new trial has not been incorporated in the bill of exceptions. Mere ref[497]*497erence to the page of the transcript will not answer. Motions must be incorporated in the bill in order to be regarded by ns—(Pacific R. R. Co. v. Opel, decided at last term). As there is no error in the record proper, the judgment is affirmed.

All concur.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sherwood, C. J.

Action on promissory notes, the questions in the case all concerning the pleas of payment and of the statute of limitations. It is impossible lor us to notice the alleged errors, as the motion for a new trial has not been incorporated in the bill of exceptions. Mere ref[497]*497erence to the page of the transcript will not answer. Motions must be incorporated in the bill in order to be regarded by ns—(Pacific R. R. Co. v. Opel, decided at last term). As there is no error in the record proper, the judgment is affirmed.

All concur.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

65 Mo. 496, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/collins-v-barding-mo-1877.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack