Collins v. Armour Fertilize Works

89 S.E. 1054, 18 Ga. App. 533, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 1103
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 15, 1916
Docket7446
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 89 S.E. 1054 (Collins v. Armour Fertilize Works) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Collins v. Armour Fertilize Works, 89 S.E. 1054, 18 Ga. App. 533, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 1103 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).

Opinion

Wade, C. J.

1. “All affidavits for the foreclosure of liens, including mortgages, and all affidavits that are the foundation of legal proceedings, and all counter-affidavits shall be amendable to the same extent as ordinary declarations, and with only the restrictions, limitations, and consequences now obtaining in the ease of ordinary declarations and pleas.” Civil Code, § 5706.

(a) "If the suit is brought in a name which is neither that of a natural person, a corporation, nor a partnership, it is a mere nullity. . . . A corporation may bring suit in its own name, and, if it fails fully to describe its legal entity, may amend by alleging that it is a corporation.” Western & Atlantic R. Co. v. Dalton Marble Works, 122 Ga. [534]*534774, 775 (50 S. E. 978). Where the name oí the plaintiff does not itself import a corporation and no allegation as to its corporate entity is made, it is not erroneous, in the absence of an offer to amend, to dismiss the petition, upon the ground that no party plaintiff is described therein. Cain v. Armenia Lodge, 12 Ga. App. 251 (77 S. E. 184). Aliter where a proper amendment is offered.

Decided September 15, 1916. Foreclosure of mortgage; from city court of Reidsville — Judge Collins. March 9, 1916. Way & BwrTshalter, for plaintiff in error. H. G. Beasley, contra.

2. The affidavit of illegality sought to vary the terms of a valid written instrument, by adding thereto another and different consideration, to wit, the extension of certain additional credit to the maker of the mortgage. The court therefore did not err in striking it.

3. The court did not err in admitting in evidence the articles of incorporation showing the corporate entity of the plaintiff, the same being properly authenticated.

4. There is no merit in any of the assignments of error.

Judgment affirmed,.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

South Cobb Builders Supply, Inc. v. Southern Concrete Products Co.
159 S.E.2d 121 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1967)
Taliaferro v. Cowart & Son Inc.
171 S.E. 406 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1933)
Saint Mark's Methodist Episcopal Church v. Georgia Power Co.
91 S.E. 1047 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
89 S.E. 1054, 18 Ga. App. 533, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 1103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/collins-v-armour-fertilize-works-gactapp-1916.