Collins Chemical & Manuf'g Co. v. Capitol City Manuf'g Co.

42 F. 64, 1890 U.S. App. LEXIS 2112

This text of 42 F. 64 (Collins Chemical & Manuf'g Co. v. Capitol City Manuf'g Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Collins Chemical & Manuf'g Co. v. Capitol City Manuf'g Co., 42 F. 64, 1890 U.S. App. LEXIS 2112 (circtdct 1890).

Opinion

Shipman, J.

The complainants’ bill for an alleged infringement of their trade-marlc makes profert of the trade-mark, and of the alleged infringement, and exhibits of the boxes and the devices, and symbols thereon, which are used by each party accompany the bill. The defendant has demurred, upon -the ground that the plaintiffs’ bill shows that they have no case. Upon the hearing of the demurrer the complainants did not appear. An inspection of the boxes shows palpably that there is no infringement. The demurrer is sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
42 F. 64, 1890 U.S. App. LEXIS 2112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/collins-chemical-manufg-co-v-capitol-city-manufg-co-circtdct-1890.