Collington v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

841 So. 2d 611, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 4437, 2003 WL 1721170
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 2, 2003
DocketNo. 4D02-4172
StatusPublished

This text of 841 So. 2d 611 (Collington v. Unemployment Appeals Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Collington v. Unemployment Appeals Commission, 841 So. 2d 611, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 4437, 2003 WL 1721170 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jonelle Collington seeks review of the Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission (U.A.C.) dismissal of her appeal from the referee’s determination that she was discharged from her place of employment for misconduct and therefore not entitled to benefits. On November 19, 2001, the Notice of Determination was mailed to Collington notifying her of her disqualification for benefits. Collington did not appeal that determination with the U.A.C. until July 17, 2002.

We affirm the U.A.C. dismissal based on the untimeliness of Collington’s appeal. Fla. Stat. § 443.151(4)(b)(2001); see Espinosa v. Cableoptics, Inc., 807 So.2d 195 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002).

AFFIRMED.

GUNTHER, STONE and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Espinosa v. Cableoptics, Inc.
807 So. 2d 195 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
841 So. 2d 611, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 4437, 2003 WL 1721170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/collington-v-unemployment-appeals-commission-fladistctapp-2003.