Collingsworth v. State

191 So. 290, 140 Fla. 175, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1077
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedOctober 3, 1939
StatusPublished

This text of 191 So. 290 (Collingsworth v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Collingsworth v. State, 191 So. 290, 140 Fla. 175, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1077 (Fla. 1939).

Opinion

Per Curiam. —

Writ of error brings for review judgment of conviction of the offense of unlawfully manufacturing intoxicating liquor.

The entire record discloses no reversible error. So, the judgment is affirmed.'

So ordered.

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Buford and Thomas, J. J., concur. Brown, J., concurs in opinion and judgment. Justices Whitfield and Chapman not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
191 So. 290, 140 Fla. 175, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1077, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/collingsworth-v-state-fla-1939.