Collingsworth v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Collingsworth v. State

191 So. 290, 140 Fla. 175, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1077

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided October 3, 1939·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam. —

Writ of error brings for review judgment of conviction of the offense of unlawfully manufacturing intoxicating liquor.

The entire record discloses no reversible error. So, the judgment is affirmed.'

So ordered.

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Buford and Thomas, J. J., concur. Brown, J., concurs in opinion and judgment. Justices Whitfield and Chapman not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam. —

Writ of error brings for review judgment of conviction of the offense of unlawfully manufacturing intoxicating liquor.

The entire record discloses no reversible error. So, the judgment is affirmed.'

So ordered.

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Buford and Thomas, J. J., concur. Brown, J., concurs in opinion and judgment. Justices Whitfield and Chapman not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Collingsworth v. State, 191 So. 290, 140 Fla. 175, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1077 (Fla. 1939).

Pincite

191 So. 290 (Collingsworth v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.