Collin v. United States

5 Cust. Ct. 486, 1940 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3197
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Collin v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 5 Cust. Ct. 488
United States Customs Court·Decided July 9, 1940·No. No. 4971; Entry No. 891-H·Published

Opinion

Cline, Judge:

This is an appeal for a reappraisement of certain glass bottles imported from Kavalier Glass Works of Sazava, Czechoslovakia, the invoice being certified on February 6, 1935.

When the case was called for trial, counsel for the plaintiffs offered a letter from the shipper to which the defendant objected on the ground that section 501 of the Tariff Act of 1930 does not make such matter admissible in evidence. The objection was sustained and the letter was marked “Exhibit 1 for identification”. The case was then submitted without the introduction of evidence and counsel for the defendant moved to dismiss the appeal on the groimd that the appellants had failed to make out a prima facie case. The motion is granted as there is nothing in the record to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the appraisement. Judgment will be entered dismissing the appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Collin v. United States, 5 Cust. Ct. 486, 1940 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3197 (cusc 1940).

5 Cust. Ct. 486 (Collin v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.