Collin v. De Puy

Supreme Court of Florida

Collin v. De Puy

85 So. 2d 231

DecidedFebruary 8, 1956

StatusPublished

This text of 85 So. 2d 231 (Collin v. De Puy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Collin v. De Puy, 85 So. 2d 231 (Fla. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard on motion of appellee to affirm the judgment appealed from pursuant to Rule 38 of the rules of this court, 30 F.S.A., and it appearing to the court from an examination of the record that said motion is appropriate and seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument;

It is accordingly ordered, adjudged and decreed that the motion to affirm the judg-[232]*232memt appealed from be and the same is hereby granted, and the judgment is

Affirmed.

DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard on motion of appellee to affirm the judgment appealed from pursuant to Rule 38 of the rules of this court, 30 F.S.A., and it appearing to the court from an examination of the record that said motion is appropriate and seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument;

It is accordingly ordered, adjudged and decreed that the motion to affirm the judg-[232]*232memt appealed from be and the same is hereby granted, and the judgment is

Affirmed.

DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

85 So. 2d 231, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/collin-v-de-puy-fla-1956.