Collin Porterfield v. Cenlar FSB, Morgan Stanley Private Bank NA, F/K/A Morgan Stanley Credit Corporation
This text of Collin Porterfield v. Cenlar FSB, Morgan Stanley Private Bank NA, F/K/A Morgan Stanley Credit Corporation (Collin Porterfield v. Cenlar FSB, Morgan Stanley Private Bank NA, F/K/A Morgan Stanley Credit Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed July 21, 2014.
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-00663-CV
COLLIN PORTERFIELD, Appellant V. CENLAR FSB, MORGAN STANLEY PRIVATE BANK NA, F/K/A MORGAN STANLEY CREDIT CORPORATION, BARRETT DAFFIN FRAPPIER TURNER & ENGEL, LLP, Appellees
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-12-00651-C
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Lang-Miers, and Justice Brown Opinion by Justice Brown The clerk’s record in this case is overdue. By letter dated June 12, 2014, we informed
appellant that the Dallas County Clerk had notified the Court that the clerk’s record had not been
filed because appellant had not paid for or made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record. We
directed appellant to file written verification that he had paid for or made arrangements to pay for
the clerk’s record or that he had been found entitled to proceed without payment of costs. We
cautioned appellant that if he did not file the required documentation within ten days, we might
dismiss the appeal without further notice. To date, the clerk’s record has not been filed,
appellant has not provided the required documentation, nor has he otherwise corresponded with
the Court regarding the status of the clerk’s record. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b).
/Ada Brown/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
140663F.P05
–2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
COLLIN PORTERFIELD, Appellant On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3, Dallas County, Texas No. 05-14-00663-CV V. Trial Court Cause No. CC-12-00651-C. Opinion delivered by Justice Brown. Chief CENLAR FSB, MORGAN STANLEY Justice Wright and Justice Lang-Miers PRIVATE BANK NA, F/K/A MORGAN participating. STANLEY CREDIT CORPORATION, BARRETT DAFFIN FRAPPIER TURNER & ENGEL, LLP, Appellees
In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.
It is ORDERED that appellees CENLAR FSB, MORGAN STANLEY PRIVATE BANK NA, F/K/A MORGAN STANLEY CREDIT CORPORATION, BARRETT DAFFIN FRAPPIER TURNER & ENGEL, LLP recover their costs of this appeal from appellant COLLIN PORTERFIELD.
Judgment entered this 21st day of July, 2014.
–3–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Collin Porterfield v. Cenlar FSB, Morgan Stanley Private Bank NA, F/K/A Morgan Stanley Credit Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/collin-porterfield-v-cenlar-fsb-morgan-stanley-pri-texapp-2014.