Colligan v. Sumner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Colligan v. Sumner

112 A.D.2d 265, 491 N.Y.S.2d 712, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 56143

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 15, 1985

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 112 A.D.2d 265 (Colligan v. Sumner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Colligan v. Sumner, 112 A.D.2d 265, 491 N.Y.S.2d 712, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 56143 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

In a medical malpractice action, plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Meade, J.), dated January 26, 1984, which denied their motion to vacate the finding of a medical malpractice panel and direct a new hearing.

Appeal dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

Orders denying vacatur of the findings of medical malpractice panels are not appealable as of right and will be reviewed "only by leave of this court upon a demonstration of good cause shown” (Kletnieks v Brookhaven Mem. Assn., 53 AD2d 169, 174). Upon a review of the record, we find that plaintiffs have failed to sustain their burden of demonstrating "good cause” to warrant granting leave to appeal from the order in question. Mangano, J. P., Gibbons, Bracken and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a medical malpractice action, plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Meade, J.), dated January 26, 1984, which denied their motion to vacate the finding of a medical malpractice panel and direct a new hearing.

Appeal dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

Orders denying vacatur of the findings of medical malpractice panels are not appealable as of right and will be reviewed "only by leave of this court upon a demonstration of good cause shown” (Kletnieks v Brookhaven Mem. Assn., 53 AD2d 169, 174). Upon a review of the record, we find that plaintiffs have failed to sustain their burden of demonstrating "good cause” to warrant granting leave to appeal from the order in question. Mangano, J. P., Gibbons, Bracken and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

112 A.D.2d 265, 491 N.Y.S.2d 712, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 56143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/colligan-v-sumner-nyappdiv-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack