Colligan v. Scott

4 Jones & S. 574
CourtThe Superior Court of New York City
DecidedDecember 31, 1873
StatusPublished

This text of 4 Jones & S. 574 (Colligan v. Scott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Colligan v. Scott, 4 Jones & S. 574 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1873).

Opinion

Action for work and labor.

John C. Connor, Jr., for appellants. Erastus Cooke, for respondent.

Opinion by Curtis, J. Barbour, Ch. J., and Van Vorst, J., concurred.

Appeal from judgment in favor of plaintiff.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 Jones & S. 574, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/colligan-v-scott-nysuperctnyc-1873.