Colligan v. 680 Newark Avenue Realty Corp.
37 A.2d 206, 131 N.J.L. 520, 1944 N.J. LEXIS 219
Opinions
The judges being equally divided on the question as to whether the judgment should be reversed, the judgment is affirmed solely because of such division, which renders any opinion by the court impossible. The judgment under review is affirmed by an equally divided court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Colligan v. 680 Newark Avenue Realty Corp., 37 A.2d 206, 131 N.J.L. 520, 1944 N.J. LEXIS 219 (N.J. 1944).
37 A.2d 206 (Colligan v. 680 Newark Avenue Realty Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mollie Krieger v. Ownership Corporation, a Corporation of New Jersey
270 F.2d 265 (Third Circuit, 1959)
Trecartin v. Mahony-Troast Construction Co.
87 A.2d 349 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1952)
Tomsky v. Kaczka
85 A.2d 809 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1952)
White v. Ellison Realty Corp.
74 A.2d 401 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1950)
Greaves v. Fogel
74 A.2d 350 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1950)
Pennsylvania-Reading Seashore Lines v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners
74 A.2d 265 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1950)
Ceccato v. Chiara
66 A.2d 548 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1949)
McClafferty v. Tide Water Associated Oil Co.
65 A.2d 652 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1948)