Collier v. White

67 Miss. 133
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1889·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Cooper, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The judgment in this cause must be reversed. The offer by White before suit brought to pay by a check the sum he admitted to be due by Tanner, and which he had agreed to pay, was not a tender sufficient in law.

The sum paid into court by White after suit brought was insufficient to defeat the plaintiff’s right to recover to the extent of the sum admitted to be due by White. No tender was made of the accrued costs, and if such sum had been tendered, the plaintiff by refusing to accept the offer would' not preclude himself from recovering to an,amount to which the evidence showed him to be entitled. Refusing the tender as made, he could not recover costs, unless he secured a verdict for a greater sum than that admitted.

On the facts of this case the plaintiff should have had judgment, at least for the sum which White had agreed with Tanner to pay.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Collier v. White, 67 Miss. 133 (Mich. 1889).

67 Miss. 133 (Collier v. White) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Baker v. B. L. Ass'n of Jackson
152 So. 288 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1934)
Cohn v. Lovell Lumber Co.
100 So. 188 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1924)
Morton v. Varnado
90 So. 77 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1921)
Pangburn v. Sifford
184 N.W. 512 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1921)
Servel v. Jamieson
255 F. 892 (Ninth Circuit, 1919)
Reeves Realty Co. v. Brown
1915 OK 126 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1915)