Collier v. State

9 S.W.2d 265, 110 Tex. Crim. 509, 1928 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 658
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 23, 1928
DocketNo. 11577.
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 9 S.W.2d 265 (Collier v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Collier v. State, 9 S.W.2d 265, 110 Tex. Crim. 509, 1928 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 658 (Tex. 1928).

Opinions

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for manufacturing intoxicating liquor; punishment, one year in the penitentiary.

The facts appearing in the transcript sufficiently support the verdict and judgment. The indictment appears to be sufficient, and is followed by the charge of the court- and the judgment and sentence.

There are two bills of exception in the record, but unfortunately both were filed one day too late for our consideration. Appellant’s motion for new trial was overruled on October 14, 1927, and in the order overruling same he was given seventy-five days in which to prepare and file bills of exception. This time expired on the 28th of December, 1927. Said bills of exception were filed on the 29th. This was too late. Benson v. State, 85 Texas Crim. Rep. 126, 210 S. W. Rep. 538. This case has been often cited with approval.

Finding no error in the record, the judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kacy v. State
50 S.W.2d 821 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1932)
Williams v. State
40 S.W.2d 142 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 S.W.2d 265, 110 Tex. Crim. 509, 1928 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 658, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/collier-v-state-texcrimapp-1928.