Collier v. State
675 So. 2d 1046, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6910, 1996 WL 366314
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Collier v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 701 So. 2d 1197 →
Opinion
We affirm the trial court’s order denying the defendant’s motion for mitigation of sentence. See Price v. State, 598 So.2d 215 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992). However, the case must be reversed in part and remanded for resen-tencing.
As correctly pointed out by the State, a miscalculation occurred as to the defendant’s credit time while in the Monroe County jail. Accordingly, the ease is remanded for correction of the time served to add an additional forty days credit.
[1047]*1047Affirmed in part; reversed in part and remanded for resentencing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Collier v. State, 675 So. 2d 1046, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6910, 1996 WL 366314 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).
675 So. 2d 1046 (Collier v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Price v. State
598 So. 2d 215 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)