Collier v. State

509 So. 2d 971, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1628, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9137
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 1, 1987·No. No. 86-2145·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

LEHAN, Judge.

Defendant, convicted of possession of cocaine, appeals from the denial of his motion for judgment of acquittal and for a new trial. We reverse.

Defendant was seen by police officers sitting on a concrete wall in what was described as a drug trafficking area. Near defendant on the ground was a package. The package was later found to contain cocaine. The officer approached defendant and placed him under arrest. The package was admitted into evidence at defendant’s trial.

There was no evidence that defendant had ever possessed the package or that it was in his constructive possession in any way. See Hons v. State, 467 So.2d 829 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); D.K.W. v. State, 398 So.2d 885 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981). No effort was made to obtain fingerprints from the package. There was no evidence that defendant fled or attempted to flee.

The only evidence, which was circumstantial, was not inconsistent with a reasonable hypothesis of innocence. Taylor v. State, 319 So.2d 114 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975).

The conviction is reversed. Defendant shall be discharged.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Collier v. State, 509 So. 2d 971, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1628, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9137 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

509 So. 2d 971 (Collier v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

R.L. v. State
557 So. 2d 133 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Edwards v. State
532 So. 2d 1311 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)