Home/Third Circuit/Collier v. Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin

Collier v. Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin

998 F.2d 1002, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 18716, 1993 WL 261080
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Collier v. Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin. Read the opinion of the Court — 977 F.2d 93 →
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided June 30, 1993·No. 92-2075·Published

Opinion

998 F.2d 1002

Collier (Janette)
v.
Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin, Hanna (Robert
G., Jr., Esquire), W.V. Pangborne Co., Inc., City
of Philadelphia, Moss (Sandra Mazer),
Kramer (Gilda); Feingold (Allen L.)

NO. 92-2075

United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.

June 30, 1993

Appeal From: E.D.Pa.,

VanArtsdalen, J.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Collier v. Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin, 998 F.2d 1002, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 18716, 1993 WL 261080 (3d Cir. 1993).

998 F.2d 1002 (Collier v. Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.