Collier v. . Hanes

169 S.E. 926, 204 N.C. 792, 1933 N.C. LEXIS 288
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedApril 12, 1933
StatusPublished

This text of 169 S.E. 926 (Collier v. . Hanes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Collier v. . Hanes, 169 S.E. 926, 204 N.C. 792, 1933 N.C. LEXIS 288 (N.C. 1933).

Opinion

Per Cueiam.

The plaintiff instituted this action to recover an amount alleged to be due for merchandise sold by the plaintiff to the defendant. The defendant denied liability and the jury answered the issue of indebtedness against the plaintiff, who appealed on error assigned in the charge of the court. We do not think the instructions given the jury are subject to the criticism that the plaintiff was denied the right of recovery in a sum less than that prayed for in the complaint. In fact, however, the plaintiff seems to have conducted his case on the theory that the contract was entire. The charge complies with Consolidated Statutes 564.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
169 S.E. 926, 204 N.C. 792, 1933 N.C. LEXIS 288, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/collier-v-hanes-nc-1933.