Collier v. County of Nassau

46 A.D.2d 970, 362 N.Y.S.2d 52, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3321
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 18, 1974
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 46 A.D.2d 970 (Collier v. County of Nassau) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Collier v. County of Nassau, 46 A.D.2d 970, 362 N.Y.S.2d 52, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3321 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

Opinion

Appeal by the self-insured employer from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, filed March 28, 1974. On November 28, 1972 claimant, a sergeant in the Nassau County Police Department, was injured in an automobile accident while traveling home after completing his tour of duty at 5:00 p.m. The accident happened at 5:10 p.m. as claimant was a passenger- with two other policemen in a vehicle owned by the employer. The vehicle was assigned to a unit and claimant had used it for six months to go to and from his home. Claimant and three other policemen had use of the car for their convenience to drive to their homes and back again. On occasions, claimant would be assigned to work in the field at which times he would drive directly from his home to the particular assignment area. Claimant and all members of the police department were subject to recall when off duty. Appellant contends that claimant’s injury was incurred while he was off duty and that his injury did not arise out of or in the course of his employment. The board held that “the employer provided transportation for the claimant in the form of a ear, to and from his place of work and the accident happened before the claimant arrived home.” Where the use of the employer’s vehicle has been used by the employee over a period of time with the employer’s consent and for the employer’s benefit, the operation of the vehicle was directly related to the employment, and any injury occurring during such operation does arise out of and in the • course of his employment. (Matter of Devito v. Imbriano, 39 A D 2d 796, affd. 33 N Y 2d 757.) In addition, since claimant was on call 24 hours a day and had the vehicle available for use in ease of recall, he was under the control of his employer, and the use of the vehicle would be for the benefit of the employer. (Matter of Juna v. New York State Police, 40 A D 2d 742.) Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Staley, Jr., J. P., Cooke, Sweeney, Main and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Love v. Village of Pleasantville
2020 NY Slip Op 07968 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Claim of Young v. New York State Police
276 A.D.2d 984 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Claim of Clark v. R. I. Suresky & Sons, Inc.
236 A.D.2d 673 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Hill v. Speckard
209 A.D.2d 1007 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Claim of De Jesus v. New York State Police
95 A.D.2d 454 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Mineral County v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF COLO.
649 P.2d 728 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1982)
Wolland v. Industrial Commission
434 N.E.2d 1132 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1982)
City of Sherwood v. Lowe
628 S.W.2d 610 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 1982)
Claim of Holcomb v. Daily News
384 N.E.2d 665 (New York Court of Appeals, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
46 A.D.2d 970, 362 N.Y.S.2d 52, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3321, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/collier-v-county-of-nassau-nyappdiv-1974.