Collier County v. Curry

166 So. 3d 967, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 9517, 2015 WL 3876355
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 24, 2015
DocketNo. 2D14-3202
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 166 So. 3d 967 (Collier County v. Curry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Collier County v. Curry, 166 So. 3d 967, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 9517, 2015 WL 3876355 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

CASANUEVA, Judge.

We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction Collier County’s challenge to the trial court’s award of attorney’s fees to Thomas C. Curry. The trial court’s ruling on attorney’s fees determined entitlement but reserved jurisdiction to determine the amount. Thus, we lack jurisdiction to review this issue. See McIlveen v. McIlveen, 644 So.2d 612, 612 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994) (holding “an order which only determines the right to attorney’s fees without setting the amount is a nonappealable, nonfinal order”). In all other respects, we affirm the final summary judgment.

Affirmed in part; dismissed in part.

NORTHCUTT and BLACK, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Collier County v. Phillippi
180 So. 3d 217 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
166 So. 3d 967, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 9517, 2015 WL 3876355, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/collier-county-v-curry-fladistctapp-2015.