Collier County v. Curry
This text of 166 So. 3d 967 (Collier County v. Curry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction Collier County’s challenge to the trial court’s award of attorney’s fees to Thomas C. Curry. The trial court’s ruling on attorney’s fees determined entitlement but reserved jurisdiction to determine the amount. Thus, we lack jurisdiction to review this issue. See McIlveen v. McIlveen, 644 So.2d 612, 612 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994) (holding “an order which only determines the right to attorney’s fees without setting the amount is a nonappealable, nonfinal order”). In all other respects, we affirm the final summary judgment.
Affirmed in part; dismissed in part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
166 So. 3d 967, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 9517, 2015 WL 3876355, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/collier-county-v-curry-fladistctapp-2015.