Colley v. Williams

50 S.E. 917, 122 Ga. 841, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 348
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided May 11, 1905·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Evans, J.

Even though certain questions propounded to the claimant were, as claimed, leading, the trial judge did not abuse his discretion in declining to exclude the answers thereto; nor were these answers objec sonable as amounting to no more than a statement of a conclusion by the witness. The contentions of the plaintiff in fi. fa. were fully and fairly submitted to the jury, and the verdict returned was sufficiently supported by evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Candler, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Colley v. Williams, 50 S.E. 917, 122 Ga. 841, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 348 (Ga. 1905).

50 S.E. 917 (Colley v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tippins v. Lane
191 S.E. 134 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1937)
Hawthorne v. Pope
180 S.E. 920 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)