Colley v. Williams

Supreme Court of Georgia

Colley v. Williams

50 S.E. 917, 122 Ga. 841, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 348

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedMay 11, 1905

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 50 S.E. 917 (Colley v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Colley v. Williams, 50 S.E. 917, 122 Ga. 841, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 348 (Ga. 1905).

Pincite

Opinion

Evans, J.

Even though certain questions propounded to the claimant were, as claimed, leading, the trial judge did not abuse his discretion in declining to exclude the answers thereto; nor were these answers objec sonable as amounting to no more than a statement of a conclusion by the witness. The contentions of the plaintiff in fi. fa. were fully and fairly submitted to the jury, and the verdict returned was sufficiently supported by evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Candler, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Evans, J.

Even though certain questions propounded to the claimant were, as claimed, leading, the trial judge did not abuse his discretion in declining to exclude the answers thereto; nor were these answers objec sonable as amounting to no more than a statement of a conclusion by the witness. The contentions of the plaintiff in fi. fa. were fully and fairly submitted to the jury, and the verdict returned was sufficiently supported by evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Candler, J., absent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 S.E. 917, 122 Ga. 841, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 348, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/colley-v-williams-ga-1905.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack