Colley v. Spivey

127 Ala. 109
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedNovember 15, 1899
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 127 Ala. 109 (Colley v. Spivey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Colley v. Spivey, 127 Ala. 109 (Ala. 1899).

Opinion

DOWDELL, J.

After judgment by default against the appellant in tlie court below, lie made a motion to set it aside on tlie ground that lie had not been served by the sheriff with a copy of the summons and complaint. The return of tlie sheriff endorsed upon the summons and complaint Avas as follows: “Executed by serving a copy on the Avithin named defendant, except as stated beloAV. Sept. 27th, 1898.” Signed, “S. M. Reeves, sheriff of Pike Oo., Ala.” Nothing appears “as stated beloAV,” but the official signature of the sheriff. This Avas a sufficient return by the officer showing an execution of the writ. The words “except as stated beloAV,” there being nothing stated below, can be treated only as surplusage.

The motion to set aside the judgment by default, Avas addressed to the sound discretion of the court, and is not'therefore subject to revision on appeal. “The action of a nisi prius court setting aside or refusing to set aside a judgment by default will not support an appeal to this court. Such orders are not within the statute which requires us to revise the action of lower courts on motion for new trials, and in the absence of statutory provision cannot be considered by us.” — Ledbetter & Co. v. Vinton, 108 Ala. 644; Allen v. Lathrop-Hatton Co., 90 Ala. 490; Truss v. Birmingham, LaG. & M. R. R. Co., 96 Ala. 316.

There is no error in the record, and the judgment of the court beloAV must be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Robinson Co. v. Beck
74 So. 2d 915 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1954)
Ex Parte State Ex Rel. Atlas Auto Finance Co.
38 So. 2d 560 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1948)
Ingalls Shipbuilding Corporation v. Cahela
36 So. 2d 513 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1948)
Thomas v. Winter Const. Co.
129 So. 293 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1930)
Ex Parte Gay
104 So. 898 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1924)
Sovereign Camp v. Gay
104 So. 898 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1924)
Carmichael v. J. C. Jones & Bro.
76 So. 478 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1917)
Hershey Chocolate Co. v. Yates
72 So. 260 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1916)
Ex parte Parker
54 So. 572 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1911)
Morrow v. Norvell-Shapleigh Hdw. Co.
51 So. 766 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
127 Ala. 109, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/colley-v-spivey-ala-1899.