Colletto v. Hudson & Manhattan Railroad
100 A. 200, 90 N.J.L. 315, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 318
Opinion
The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Swayze, Trexchard, Mixture, Kallsch, Black, IIeppexji ether, Williams, Gardxer, JJ. 10.
For reversal—ISTone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Colletto v. Hudson & Manhattan Railroad, 100 A. 200, 90 N.J.L. 315, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 318 (N.J. 1917).
100 A. 200 (Colletto v. Hudson & Manhattan Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Leban v. Range Rapid Transit Co.
208 N.W. 533 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1926)