Colletti v. Pereira

61 A.D.3d 804, 876 N.Y.S.2d 716
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 21, 2009
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 61 A.D.3d 804 (Colletti v. Pereira) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Colletti v. Pereira, 61 A.D.3d 804, 876 N.Y.S.2d 716 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the [805]*805plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Satterfield, J.), dated January 31, 2008, as, upon reargument and renewal, granted the motion of the defendant William A. Butler, Jr., for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against him.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

William A. Butler, Jr., a volunteer emergency medical technician for the LaGrange Fire District, was paged to an accident at 1:40 a.m. on July 25, 2002. He was traveling to the site of the accident in his vehicle, northbound on Route 82, a winding mountain road, at or near the 55 miles-per-hour speed limit, with his emergency vehicle blue strobe light illuminated. Upon emerging from a curve, he saw the plaintiffs’ vehicle. Butler pushed down on his brakes, but was unable to come to a complete stop. His car skidded approximately two car lengths and struck the plaintiffs’ vehicle in the rear.

The Supreme Court properly determined that Butler established his prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether Butler acted with “wilful negligence or malfeasance” (General Municipal Law § 205-b; see Tobacco v North Babylon Fire Dept., 251 AD2d 398 [1998]) or with “reckless disregard for the safety of others” (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1104 [e]; see Szczerbiak v Pilat, 90 NY2d 553, 557 [1997]; Saarinen v Kerr, 84 NY2d 494 [1994]; Campbell v City of Elmira, 84 NY2d 505 [1994]; DiFranco v Essig, 2 AD3d 669 [2003]; Powell v City of Mount Vernon, 228 AD2d 572 [1996]). Fisher, J.P., Angiolillo, Balkin and Belen, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schleger v. Jurcsak
108 A.D.3d 515 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
61 A.D.3d 804, 876 N.Y.S.2d 716, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/colletti-v-pereira-nyappdiv-2009.