Colletta v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Colletta v. State

461 S.W.3d 841, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 391, 2015 WL 1698123

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 14, 2015·No. ED 101356·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Christopher Colletta appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.15¹ motion. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court’s denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2014).

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Christopher Colletta appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.15¹ motion. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court’s denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2014).

Footnotes

Colletta v. State, 461 S.W.3d 841, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 391, 2015 WL 1698123 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

461 S.W.3d 841 (Colletta v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.